Paper detail

Quantitative version of the Kipnis-Varadhan theorem and Monte Carlo approximation of homogenized coefficients

This article is devoted to the analysis of a Monte Carlo method to approximate effective coefficients in stochastic homogenization of discrete elliptic equations. We consider the case of independent and identically distributed coefficients, and adopt the point of view of the random walk in a random environment. Given some final time t>0, a natural approximation of the homogenized coefficients is given by the empirical average of the final squared positions re-scaled by t of n independent random walks in n independent environments. Relying on a quantitative version of the Kipnis-Varadhan theorem combined with estimates of spectral exponents obtained by an original combination of PDE arguments and spectral theory, we first give a sharp estimate of the error between the homogenized coefficients and the expectation of the re-scaled final position of the random walk in terms of t. We then complete the error analysis by quantifying the fluctuations of the empirical average in terms of n and t, and prove a large-deviation estimate, as well as a central limit theorem. Our estimates are optimal, up to a logarithmic correction in dimension 2.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.