Paper detail

Quantitative use of electron energy-loss spectroscopy Mo-M$_{2,3}$ edges for the study of molybdenum oxides

Because of the large energy separation between O-K and Mo-L$_{2,3}$ edges, extracting precise and reliable chemical information from core-loss EELS analyze of molybdenum oxides has always been a challenge. In this regard Mo-M$_{2,3}$ edges represents an interesting alternative as they are situated close to the O-K edges. They should allow thus the extraction of a wealth of chemical information from the same spectra. However the main difficulty to overcome in order to work properly with these edges is the delayed maxima of the Mo-M$_{4,5}$ edges which hinders the automated background subtraction with the usual inverse power low function. In this study we propose another background subtraction method specifically designed to overcome this obstacle and we apply it to the study of MoO3 and MoO2. We are able to show that quantitative chemical information can be precisely and accurately determined from the joined analyze of O-K and Mo-M$_{2,3}$ edges. In particular k-factors are derived as a function of the integration window width and standard errors close to 2% are reported. The possibility to discriminate the two oxides thanks to chemical shifts and energy-loss near-edge structures is also investigated and discussed. Furthermore the M$_3$/M$_2$ ratios are derived and are found to be strongly dependent on the local chemical environment. This result is confirmed by multiplet calculations for which the crystal field parameters have been determined by ab initio calculations. The whole methodology as well as the conclusions presented in this paper should be easily transposable to any transitions metal oxides of the 4d family. This work should open a new and easier way regarding the quantitative EELS analyses of these compounds.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.