Paper detail

Quantitative unique continuation for real-valued solutions to second order elliptic equations in the plane

In this article, we study a quantitative form of the Landis conjecture on exponential decay for real-valued solutions to second order elliptic equations with variable coefficients in the plane. In particular, we prove the following qualitative form of Landis conjecture, for $W_1, W_2 \in L^{\infty}(\mathbb R^2;\mathbb R^2)$, $V \in L^{\infty}(\mathbb R^2;\mathbb R)$ and $u \in H_{\mathrm{loc}}^{1}(\mathbb R^2)$ a real-valued weak solution to $-Δu - \nabla \cdot ( W_1 u ) +W_2 \cdot \nabla u + V u = 0$ in $\mathbb R^2$, satisfying for $δ>0$, $|u(x)| \leq \exp(- |x|^{1+δ})$, $x \in \mathbb R^2$, then $u \equiv 0$. Our methodology of proof is inspired by the one recently developed by Logunov, Malinnikova, Nadirashvili, and Nazarov that have treated the equation $-Δu + V u = 0$ in $\mathbb R^2$. Nevertheless, several differences and additional difficulties appear. New weak quantitative maximum principles are established for the construction of a positive multiplier in a suitable perforated domain, depending on the nodal set of $u$. The resulted divergence elliptic equation is then transformed into a non-homogeneous $\partial_{\overline{z}}$ equation thanks to a generalization of Stoilow factorization theorem obtained by the theory of quasiconformal mappings, an approximate type Poincaré lemma and the use of the Cauchy transform. Finally, a suitable Carleman estimate applied to the operator $\partial_{\overline{z}}$ is the last ingredient of our proof.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.