Paper detail

Quantitative Stratification and the Regularity of Harmonic Maps and Minimal Currents

We introduce techniques for turning estimates on the infinitesimal behavior of solutions to nonlinear equations (statements concerning tangent cones and blow ups) into more effective control. In the present paper, we focus on proving regularity theorems for stationary and minimizing harmonic maps and minimal currents. There are several aspects to our improvements of known estimates. First, we replace known estimates on the Hausdorff dimension of singular sets by estimates on their Minkowski r-content, or equivalently, on the volumes of their r-tubular neighborhoods. Second, we give improved regularity control with respect to the number of derivatives bounded and/or on the norm in which the derivatives are bounded. As an example of the former, our results for minimizing harmonic maps f : M->N between riemannian manifolds include a priori bounds in W^{1,p}\cap W^{2,p} for all p < 3. These are the first such bounds involving second derivatives in general dimensions. Finally, the quantity we control is actually provides much stronger information than follows from a bound on the L^p norm of derivatives. Namely, we obtain L^p bounds for the inverse of the regularity scale r_f(x)=max{r:sup_{B_r(x)}(r|\nabla f|+r^2|\nabla^2 f|)\leq 1}. Applications to minimal hypersufaces include a priori L^p bounds for the second fundamental form A for all p < 7. Previously known bounds were for p < 2+ε(n). Again, the full theorem is much stronger and yields Lp bounds for the corresponding regularity scale r_A(x)=max{r:sup_{B_r(x)}rA\leq 1}. In outline, our discussion follows that of an earlier paper in which we proved analogous estimates in the context of noncollapsed riemannian manifolds with a lower bound on Ricci curvature. These were applied to Einstein manifolds. A key point in all of these arguments is to establish the relevant quantitative differentiation theorem.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.