Paper detail

Quantitative Small Subgraph Conditioning

We revisit the method of small subgraph conditioning, used to establish that random regular graphs are Hamiltonian a.a.s. We refine this method using new technical machinery for random $d$-regular graphs on $n$ vertices that hold not just asymptotically, but for any values of $d$ and $n$. This lets us estimate how quickly the probability of containing a Hamiltonian cycle converges to 1, and it produces quantitative contiguity results between different models of random regular graphs. These results hold with $d$ held fixed or growing to infinity with $n$. As additional applications, we establish the distributional convergence of the number of Hamiltonian cycles when $d$ grows slowly to infinity, and we prove that the number of Hamiltonian cycles can be approximately computed from the graph's eigenvalues for almost all regular graphs.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.