Paper detail

Quantitative prediction of the fracture toughness of amorphous carbon from atomic-scale simulations

Fracture is the ultimate source of failure of amorphous carbon (a-C) films, however it is challenging to measure fracture properties of a-C from nano-indentation tests and results of reported experiments are not consistent. Here, we use atomic-scale simulations to make quantitative and mechanistic predictions on fracture of a-C. Systematic large-scale K-field controlled atomic-scale simulations of crack propagation are performed for a-C samples with densities of $ρ=2.5, \, 3.0 \, \text{ and } 3.5~\text{g/cm}^{3}$ created by liquid quenches for a range of quench rates $\dot{T}_q = 10 - 1000~\text{K/ps}$. The simulations show that the crack propagates by nucleation, growth, and coalescence of voids. Distances of $ \approx 1\, \text{nm}$ between nucleated voids result in a brittle-like fracture toughness. We use a crack growth criterion proposed by Drugan, Rice \& Sham to estimate steady-state fracture toughness based on our short crack-length fracture simulations. Fracture toughness values of $2.4-6.0\,\text{MPa}\sqrt{\text{m}}$ for initiation and $3-10\,\text{MPa}\sqrt{\text{m}}$ for the steady-state crack growth are within the experimentally reported range. These findings demonstrate that atomic-scale simulations can provide quantitatively predictive results even for fracture of materials with a ductile crack propagation mechanism.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.