Paper detail

Quantitative Prediction of Fracture Toughness $(K_{{\rm I}c})$ of Polymer by Fractography Using Deep Neural Networks

Fracture surfaces provide various types of information about fracture. The fracture toughness $K_{{\rm I}c}$, which represents the resistance to fracture, can be estimated using the three-dimensional (3D) information of a fracture surface, i.e., its roughness. However, this is time-consuming and expensive to obtain the 3D information of a fracture surface; thus, it is desirable to estimate $K_{{\rm I}c}$ from a two-dimensional (2D) image, which can be easily obtained. In recent years, methods of estimating a 3D structure from its 2D image using deep learning have been rapidly developed. In this study, we propose a framework for fractography that directly estimates $K_{{\rm I}c}$ from a 2D fracture surface image using deep neural networks (DNNs). Typically, image recognition using a DNN requires a tremendous amount of image data, which is difficult to acquire for fractography owing to the high experimental cost. To compensate for the limited data, in this study, we used the transfer learning (TL) method, and constructed high-performance prediction models even with a small dataset by transferring machine learning models trained using other large datasets. We found that the regression model obtained using our proposed framework can predict $K_{{\rm I}c}$ in the range of approximately 1-5 [MPa$\sqrt{m}$] with a standard deviation of the estimation error of approximately $\pm$0.37 [MPa$\sqrt{m}$]. The present results demonstrate that the DNN trained with TL opens a new route for quantitative fractography by which parameters of fracture process can be estimated from a fracture surface even with a small dataset. The proposed framework also enables the building of regression models in a few hours. Therefore, our framework enables us to screen a large number of image datasets available in the field of materials science and find candidates that are worth expensive machine learning analysis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.