Paper detail

Quantitative Morphology of Galaxies from the SDSS I: Luminosity in Bulges and Disks

In the first paper of this series we use the publicly available code Gim2D to model the r- and i-band images of all galaxies in a magnitude-limited sample of roughly 1800 morphologically classified galaxies taken from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The model is a concentric superposition of two components, each with elliptical isophotes with constant flattening and position angle. The disk luminosity profile is assumed exponential, while the bulge is assumed to have a de Vaucouleurs or a Sersic profile. We find that the parameters returned by Gim2D depend little on the waveband or bulge profile used; their formal uncertainties are usually small. Nevertheless, for bright galaxies the measured distribution of b/a, the apparent disk flattening, deviates strongly from the expected uniform distribution, showing that the `disk' identified by the code frequently corresponds to an intrinsically 3-dimensional structure rather than to a true thin disk. We correct approximately for this systematic problem using the observed statistics of the b/a distribution and estimate, as a function of absolute magnitude, the mean fractions of galaxy light in disks and in `pure bulge' systems (those with no detectable disk). For the brightest galaxies the disk light fraction is about 10% and about 80% are `pure bulge' systems. For faint galaxies most of the light is in disks and we do not detect a `pure bulge' population. Averaging over the galaxy population as a whole, we find that 54 \pm 2% of the local cosmic luminosity density at both r and i comes from disks and 32 \pm 2% from `pure bulge' systems. The remaining 14 \pm 2% comes from bulges in galaxies with detectable disks.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.