Paper detail

Quantitative evaluation of laser-induced fluorescence in magnetized plasma accounting for disalignment effect

Quantitative evaluation of tunable diode laser induced fluorescence (TDLIF) measurements in magnetized plasma take into account Zeeman splitting of energetic levels and intra-multiplet mixing defining the density distribution (alignment) of excited $\mathrm{2p_8}$ multiplet is discussed in this paper. TDLIF measurements were used to evaluate light-transport properties in a strongly magnetized optically thick argon plasma under different pressure conditions. Therefore, a coupled system of rate balance equations were constructed to describe laser pumping of individual magnetic sub-levels of $\mathrm{2p_8}$ state through frequency separated sub-transitions originating from $\mathrm{1s_4}$ magnetic sub-levels. The density distribution of $\mathrm{2p_8}$ multiplet was described by balancing laser pumping with losses including radiative decay, transfer of excitation between the neighboring multiplets driven by neutral collisions and quenching due to electron and neutral collisions. Resulting $\mathrm{2p_8}$ magnetic sub-level densities were then used to model polarization dependent fluorescence, consider self-absorption, which could be directly compared with measured polarization resolved TDLIF measurements. This enables to obtain unique solutions for the $\mathrm{1s_4}$ and $\mathrm{1s_5}$ magnetic sub-level densities which were in good agreement with the densities obtained by laser absorption measurements. It is shown that LIF measurements in magnetized plasma conditions have strong pressure dependence that should be corrected consider effective disalignment rate. The presented measurement method and model can help further understanding and improve description of optical emission of argon in magnetized conditions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.