Paper detail

Quantitative estimates in approximation by Bernstein-Durrmeyer-Choquet operators with respect to monotone and submodular set functions

For the qualitative results of pointwise and uniform approximation obtained in \cite{Gal-Opris}, we present general quantitative estimates in terms of the modulus of continuity and in terms of a $K$-functional, for the generalized multivariate Bernstein-Durrmeyer operator $M_{n, Γ_{n, x}}$, written in terms of the Choquet integral with respect to a family of monotone and submodular set functions, $Γ_{n, x}$, on the standard $d$-dimensional simplex. When $Γ_{n, x}$ reduces to two elements, one a Choquet submodular set function and the other one a Borel measure, for suitable modified Bernstein-Durrmeyer operators, univariate $L^{p}$-approximations, $p\ge 1$, with estimates in terms of a $K$-functional are proved. In the particular cases when $d=1$ and the Choquet integral is taken with respect to some concrete possibility measures, the pointwise estimate in terms of the modulus of continuity is detailed. Some simple concrete examples of operators improving the classical error estimates are presented. Potential applications to practical methods dealing with data, like learning theory and regression models, also are mentioned.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.