Paper detail

Quantitative estimates for homogenization of nonlinear elliptic operators in perforated domains

This paper was devoted to study the quantitative homogenization problems for nonlinear elliptic operators in perforated domains. We obtained a sharp error estimate $O(\varepsilon)$ when the problem was anchored in the reference domain $\varepsilonω$. If concerning a bounded perforated domain, one will see a bad influence from the boundary layers, which leads to the loss of the convergence rate by $O(\varepsilon^{1/2})$. Equipped with the error estimates, we developed both interior and boundary Lipschitz estimates at large-scales. As an application, we received the so-called quenched Calderón-Zygumund estimates by Shen&#39;s real arguments. To overcome some difficulties, we improved the extension theory from (\cite[Theorem 4.3]{OSY}) to $L^p$-versions with $\frac{2d}{d+1}-ε<p<\frac{2d}{d-1}+ε$ and $0<ε\ll1$. Appealing to this, we established Poincaré-Sobolev inequalities of local type on perforated domains. Some of results in the present literature are new even for related linear elliptic models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.