Paper detail

Quantitative cone-beam CT reconstruction with polyenergetic scatter model fusion

Scatter can account for large errors in cone-beam CT (CBCT) due to its wide field of view, and its complicated nature makes its compensation difficult. Iterative polyenergetic reconstruction algorithms offer the potential to provide quantitative imaging in CT, but they are usually incompatible with scatter contaminated measurements. In this work, we introduce a polyenergetic convolutional scatter model that is directly fused into the reconstruction process, and exploits information readily available at each iteration for a fraction of additional computational cost. We evaluate this method with numerical and real CBCT measurements, and show significantly enhanced electron density estimation and artifact mitigation over pre-calculated fast adaptive scatter kernel superposition (fASKS). We demonstrate our approach has two levels of benefit: reducing the bias introduced by estimating scatter prior to reconstruction; and adapting to the spectral and spatial properties of the specimen.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.