Paper detail

Quantifying the Imprecision of Accretion Theory and Implications for Multi-Epoch Observations of Protoplanetary Discs

If accretion disc emission results from turbulent dissipation, then axisymmetric accretion theory must be used as a mean field theory: turbulent flows are at most axisymmetric only when suitably averaged. Spectral predictions therefore have an intrinsic imprecision that must be quantified to interpret the variability exhibited by a source observed at different epochs. We quantify contributions to the stochastic imprecision that come from azimuthal and radial averaging and show that the imprecision is minimized for a particular choice of radial averaging, which in turn, corresponds to an optimal spectral resolution of a telescope for a spatially unresolved source. If the optimal spectral resolution is less than that of the telescope then the data can be binned to compare to the theoretical prediction of minimum imprecision. Little stochastic variability is predicted at radii much larger than that at which the dominant eddy turnover time ($\sim$ orbit time) exceeds the time interval between observations; the epochs would then be sampling the same member of the stochastic ensemble. We discuss the application of these principles to protoplanetary discs for which there is presently a paucity of multi-epoch data but for which such data acquisition projects are underway.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.