Paper detail

Quantifying the impact of detection bias from blended galaxies on cosmic shear surveys

Increasingly large areas in cosmic shear surveys lead to a reduction of statistical errors, necessitating to control systematic errors increasingly better. One of these systematic effects was initially studied by Hartlap et al. in 2011, namely that image overlap with (bright foreground) galaxies may prevent some distant (source) galaxies to remain undetected. Since this overlap is more likely to occur in regions of high foreground density -- which tend to be the regions in which the shear is largest -- this detection bias would cause an underestimation of the estimated shear correlation function. This detection bias adds to the possible systematic of image blending, where nearby pairs or multiplets of images render shear estimates more uncertain and thus may cause a reduction in their statistical weight. Based on simulations with data from the Kilo-Degree Survey, we study the conditions under which images are not detected. We find an approximate analytic expression for the detection probability in terms of the separation and brightness ratio to the neighbouring galaxies. Applying this fitting formula to weak lensing ray tracing through, and the galaxy distribution in the Millennium Simulation, we estimate that the detection bias alone leads to an underestimate of $S_8=σ_8\sqrt{Ω_\mathrm{m}/0.3}$ by almost 2\% and can therefore not be neglected in current and forthcoming cosmic shear surveys.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.