Paper detail

Quantifying the effect of cooled initial conditions on cosmic string network evolution

Quantitative studies of the evolution and cosmological consequences of networks of cosmic strings (or other topological defects) require a combination of numerical simulations and analytic modeling with the velocity-dependent one-scale (VOS) model. In previous work, we demonstrated that a GPU-accelerated code for local Abelian-Higgs string networks enables a statistical separation of key dynamical processes affecting the evolution of the string networks and thus a precise calibration of the VOS model. Here we further exploit this code in a detailed study of two important aspects connecting the simulations with the VOS model. First, we study the sensitivity of the model calibration to the presence (or absence) of thermal oscillations due to high gradients in the initial conditions. This is relevant since in some Abelian-Higgs simulations described in the literature a period of artificial (unphysical) dissipation---usually known as cooling---is introduced with the goal of suppressing these oscillations and accelerating the convergence to scaling. We show that a small amount of cooling has no statistically significant impact on the VOS model calibration, while a longer dissipation period does have a noticeable effect. Second, in doing this analysis we also introduce an improved Markov Chain Monte Carlo based pipeline for calibrating the VOS model, Comparison to our previous bootstrap based pipeline shows that the latter accurately determined the best-fit values of the VOS model parameter, but underestimated the uncertainties in some of the parameters. Overall, our analysis shows that the calibration pipeline is robust and can be applied to future much larger field theory simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.