Paper detail

Quantifying structure-property relationships during resistance spot welding of an aluminum 6061-T6 joint

Microstructure-property relationships of resistance spot welded 6061-T6 aluminum alloy lap joints were investigated via mechanical testing and microscopy techniques. Quasi-static tensile and novel shear punch tests were employed to measure the mechanical properties of the distinct weld regions. Quasi-static tensile and shear punch tests revealed constantly decreasing strength and ductility as the weld center was approached. For instance, the ultimate tensile strength of the fusion zone decreased by ~52% from the parent material (341 MPa to 162 MPa) while the yield strength decreased by ~62% (312 MPa to 120 MPa). The process-induced microstructures were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy and optical microscopy to elucidate the underlying cause of the reduced mechanical properties. Fractography reveals void growth from particles being the dominant damage mechanism in the parent material as compared to void nucleation in the fusion zone. Overall, significant changes in the mechanical behavior across the weld are the result of a change in microstructure congruent with a loss of T6 condition (precipitate coarsening).

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.