Paper detail

Quantifying playmaking ability in hockey

It is often said that a sign of a great player is that he makes the players around him better. The player may or may not score much himself, but his teammates perform better when he plays. One way a hockey player can improve his or her teammates' performance is to create goal scoring opportunities. Unfortunately, in hockey goal scoring is relatively infrequent, and statistics like assists can be unreliable as a measure of a player's playmaking ability. Assists also depend on playing time, power play usage, the strength of a player's linemates, and other factors. In this paper we develop a metric for quantifying playmaking ability that addresses these issues. Our playmaking metric has two benefits over assists for which we can provide statistical evidence: it is more consistent than assists, and it is better than assists at predicting future assists. Quantifying player contributions using this measure can assist decision-makers in identifying, acquiring, and integrating successful playmakers into their lineups.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.