Paper detail

Quantifying parameter errors due to the peculiar velocities of type Ia supernovae

The fitting of the observed redshifts and magnitudes of type Ia supernovae to what we would see in homogeneous cosmological models has led to constraints on cosmological parameters. However, in doing such fits it is assumed that the sampled supernovae are moving with the Hubble flow, i.e. that their peculiar velocities are zero. In reality, peculiar velocities will modify supernova data in a way that can impact best-fit cosmological parameters. We theoretically quantify this effect in the nonlinear regime with a Monte-Carlo analysis, using data from semi-analytic galaxy catalogs that are built from the Millennium N-body simulation. We find scaling relations for the errors in best-fit parameters resulting solely from peculiar velocities, as a function of the total number of sources in a supernova survey N and its maximum redshift z_max. For low redshift surveys, we find that these errors can be of the same order of magnitude as the errors due to an intrinsic magnitude scatter of 0.1 mag. For a survey with N=2000 and z_max=1.7, we estimate that the expected peculiar velocity-induced errors in the best-fit cosmological constant density and equation of state can be sigma_Lambda~0.009 and sigma_w~0.01, respectively, which are subdominant to the errors due to the intrinsic scatter. We further find that throwing away supernova data below a redshift z~0.01-0.02 can reduce the combined error, due to peculiar velocities and the intrinsic scatter, but by only about 10%.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.