Paper detail

Quantifying nonlocality: how outperforming local quantum codes is expensive

Quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a promising avenue to reduce the cost of constructing scalable quantum circuits. However, it is unclear how to implement these codes in practice. Seminal results of Bravyi & Terhal, and Bravyi, Poulin & Terhal have shown that quantum LDPC codes implemented through local interactions obey restrictions on their dimension $k$ and distance $d$. Here we address the complementary question of how many long-range interactions are required to implement a quantum LDPC code with parameters $k$ and $d$. In particular, in 2D we show that a quantum LDPC with distance $n^{1/2 + ε}$ code requires $Ω(n^{1/2 + ε})$ interactions of length $\widetildeΩ(n^ε)$. Further a code satisfying $k \propto n$ with distance $d \propto n^α$ requires $\widetildeΩ(n)$ interactions of length $\widetildeΩ(n^{α/2})$. Our results are derived using bounds on quantum codes from graph metrics. As an application of these results, we consider a model called a stacked architecture, which has previously been considered as a potential way to implement quantum LDPC codes. In this model, although most interactions are local, a few of them are allowed to be very long. We prove that limited long-range connectivity implies quantitative bounds on the distance and code dimension.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.