Paper detail

Quantifying Microstructural Evolution via Time-Dependent Reduced-Dimension Metrics Based on Hierarchical $n$-Point Polytope Functions

We devise reduced-dimension metrics for effectively measuring the distance between two points (i.e., microstructures) in the microstructure space and quantifying the pathway associated with microstructural evolution, based on a recently introduced set of hierarchical $n$-point polytope functions $P_n$. The $P_n$ functions provide the probability of finding particular $n$-point configurations associated with regular $n$-polytopes in the material system, and a special sub-set of the standard $n$-point correlation functions $S_n$ that effectively decomposes the structural features in the systems into regular polyhedral basis with different symmetry. The $n$-th order metric $Ω_n$ is defined as the $\mathbb{L}_1$ norm associated with the $P_n$ functions of two distinct microstructures. By choosing a reference initial state (i.e., a microstructure associated with $t_0 = 0$), the $Ω_n(t)$ set quantifies the evolution of distinct polyhedral symmetries and can in principle capture emerging polyhedral symmetries that are not apparent in the initial state. To demonstrate their utility, we apply the $Ω_n$ metrics to a 2D binary system undergoing spinodal decomposition to extract the phase separation dynamics via the temporal scaling behavior of the corresponding $Ω_n(t)$, which reveals mechanisms governing the evolution. Moreover, we employ $Ω_n(t)$ to analyze pattern evolution during vapor-deposition of phase-separating alloy films with different surface contact angles, which exhibit rich evolution dynamics including both unstable and oscillating patterns. The $Ω_n$ metrics have potential applications in establishing quantitative processing-structure-property relationships, as well as real-time processing control and optimization of complex heterogeneous material systems.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.