Paper detail

Quantifying Inaccuracies in Modeling COVID-19 Pandemic within a Continuous Time Picture

Typically, mathematical simulation studies on COVID-19 pandemic forecasting are based on deterministic differential equations which assume that both the number ($n$) of individuals in various epidemiological classes and the time ($t$) on which they depend are quantities that vary continuous. This picture contrasts with the discrete representation of $n$ and $t$ underlying the real epidemiological data reported in terms daily numbers of infection cases, for which a description based on finite difference equations would be more adequate. Adopting a logistic growth framework, in this paper we present a quantitative analysis of the errors introduced by the continuous time description. This analysis reveals that, although the height of the epidemiological curve maximum is essentially unaffected, the position $T_{1/2}^{c}$ obtained within the continuous time representation is systematically shifted backwards in time with respect to the position $T_{1/2}^{d}$ predicted within the discrete time representation. Rather counterintuitively, the magnitude of this temporal shift $τ\equiv T_{1/2}^{c} - T_{1/2}^{d} < 0$ is basically insensitive to changes in infection rate $κ$. For a broad range of $κ$ values deduced from COVID-19 data at extreme situations (exponential growth in time and complete lockdown), we found a rather robust estimate $τ\simeq -2.65\,\mbox{day}^{-1}$. Being obtained without any particular assumption, the present mathematical results apply to logistic growth in general without any limitation to a specific real system.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.