Paper detail

Quantifying evolutionary dynamics of the basic genome of E. coli

The ~4-Mbp basic genome shared by 32 independent isolates of E. coli representing considerable population diversity has been approximated by whole-genome multiple-alignment and computational filtering designed to remove mobile elements and highly variable regions. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 496 basic-genome pairs are identified and clonally inherited stretches are distinguished from those acquired by horizontal transfer (HT) by sharp discontinuities in SNP density. The six least diverged genome-pairs each have only one or two HT stretches, each occupying 42-115-kbp of basic genome and containing at least one gene cluster known to confer selective advantage. At higher divergences, the typical mosaic pattern of interspersed clonal and HT stretches across the entire basic genome are observed, including likely fragmented integrations across a restriction barrier. A simple model suggests that individual HT events are of the order of 10-kbp and are the chief contributor to genome divergence, bringing in almost 12 times more SNPs than point mutations. As a result of continuing horizontal transfer of such large segments, 400 out of the 496 strain-pairs beyond genomic divergence of share virtually no genomic material with their common ancestor. We conclude that the active and continuing horizontal transfer of moderately large genomic fragments is likely to be mediated primarily by a co evolving population of phages that distribute random genome fragments throughout the population by generalized transduction, allowing efficient adaptation to environmental changes.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.