Paper detail

Quantifying epitaxial growth using a purely topographical signal

Thin films are ubiquitous, with uses ranging from optoelectronics to antibacterial coatings. Unfortunately, precisely quantifying how the choice of substrate influences epitaxial growth remains an unsolved problem. Here, a novel thin film of holmium oxide with record-high paramagnetic saturation was grown on a variety of substrates. Conventional attempts to extract epitaxial information to characterize the growth mechanism were ineffective, due to the unique size regime of the product. Instead, a signal-processing inspired Fourier method was used to elucidate information on epitaxial ordering from purely topographical data, avoiding the pitfalls of atomic-level diffraction. Further, we define and utilize an inner product-based metric termed a q-score that can quantify the relative degree of ordering of epitaxial crystallites. The q-score provides a direct measure of epitaxy, enabling more quantitative future studies of thin film growth.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.