Paper detail

Quantified HI Morphology IV: The Merger Fraction and Rate in WHISP

The morphology of the atomic hydrogen (HI) disk of a spiral galaxy is the first component to be disturbed by a gravitational interaction such as a merger between two galaxies. We use a simple parametrisation of the morphology of HI column density maps of Westerbork HI Spiral Project (WHISP) to select those galaxies that are likely undergoing a significant interaction. Merging galaxies occupy a particular part of parameter space defined by Asymmetry (A), the relative contribution of the 20% brightest pixels to the second order moment of the column density map (M20) and the distribution of the second order moment over all the pixels (GM). Based on their HI morphology, we find that 13% of the WHISP galaxies are in an interaction (Concentration-M20) and only 7% based on close companions in the data-cube. This apparent discrepancy can be attributed to the difference in visibility time scales: mergers are identifiable as close pairs for 0.5 Gyr but ~1 Gyr by their disturbed HI morphology. Expressed as volume merger rates, the two estimates agree very well: 7 and 6.8 x 10^-3 mergers Gyr^-1 Mpc^-3 for paired and morphologically disturbed HI disks respectively. The consistency of our merger fractions to those published for bigger surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, shows that HI morphology can be a very viable way to identify mergers in a large HI survey. The relatively high value for the volume merger rate may be a bias in the selection or WHISP volume. The expected boon in high-resolution HI data by the planned MeerKAT, ASKAP and WSRT/APERTIF radio observatories will reveal the importance of mergers in the local Universe and, with the advent of SKA, over cosmic times.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.