Paper detail

Quality tetrahedral mesh generation with HXT

We proposed, in a recent paper (10.1002/nme.5987), a fast 3D parallel Delaunay kernel for tetrahedral mesh generation. This kernel was however incomplete in the sense that it lacked the necessary mesh improvement tools. The present paper builds on that previous work and proposes a fast parallel mesh improvement stage that delivers high-quality tetrahedral meshes compared to alternative open-source mesh generators. Our mesh improvement toolkit includes edge removal and improved Laplacian smoothing as well as a brand new operator called the Growing SPR Cavity, which can be regarded as the mother of all flips. The paper describes the workflow of the new mesh improvement schedule, as well as the details of the implementation. The result of this research is a series of open-source scalable software components, called HXT, whose overall efficiency is demonstrated on practical examples by means of a detailed comparative benchmark with two open-source mesh generators: Gmsh and TetGen.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.