Paper detail

Quality Control System Response to Stochastic Growth of Amyloid Fibrils

We introduce a stochastic model describing aggregation of misfolded proteins and degradation by the protein quality control system in a single cell. In analogy with existing literature, aggregates can grow, nucleate and fragment stochastically. We assume that the quality control system acts as an enzyme that can degrade aggregates at different stages of the growth process, with an efficiency that decreases with the size of the aggregate. We show how this stochastic dynamics, depending on the parameter choice, leads to two qualitatively different behaviors: a homeostatic state, where the quality control system is stable and aggregates of large sizes are not formed, and an oscillatory state, where the quality control system periodically breaks down, allowing for the formation of large aggregates. We discuss how these periodic breakdowns may constitute a mechanism for the sporadic development of neurodegenerative diseases.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.