Paper detail

Quality-Aware Collaborative Multi-Positive Contrastive Learning for Sequential Recommendation

The effectiveness of contrastive learning in sequential recommendation hinges on the construction of contrastive views, which ideally should be both semantically consistent and diverse. However, most existing CL-based methods rely on heuristic augmentations that are prone to removing crucial items or disrupting transition patterns, leading to semantic drift. While a few studies have explored learnable augmentations to improve view quality, they often suffer from limited diversity and still necessitate heuristic aids. Furthermore, the quality differences across views are rarely modeled explicitly and adaptively, aggravating the false-positive issue. To address these issues, we propose Quality-aware Collaborative Multi-Positive Contrastive Learning for sequential recommendation. First, we introduce a learnable collaborative sequence augmentation module that generates two augmented views under two complementary collaborative contexts, one based on same-target sequences and the other on similar sequences, thereby enhancing view diversity while preserving intent consistency.Second, we design a quality-aware mechanism, tightly integrated into the model representations, which estimates each view' s quality from the confidence of its augmentation operations and assigns adaptive weights to ensure that high-confidence views contribute more supervision while low-confidence ones contribute less.Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that QCMP-CL outperforms state-of-the-art CL-based sequential recommendation baselines.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.