Paper detail

Qualities of axion and LSP in Pati-Salam unification with $Z^R_{4}\times Z_{N}$ symmetry

In this paper we construct supersymmetric Pati-Salam (PS) models containing the minimal supersymmetric standard model and an invisible axion. The models include two discrete symmetries, $\mathbb{Z}_4^R \times \mathbb{Z}_N$, which maintain the $quality$ of the accidental Peccei-Quinn (PQ) symmetry and thus the solution to the strong CP problem. We require that the discrete anomaly conditions are satisfied for both $\mathbb{Z}_4^R \times G_{\rm PS}^2$ and $ \mathbb{Z}_N \times G_{\rm PS}^2$. The vacuum expectation value of the PQ field spontaneously breaks all the discrete symmetries. R-parity is violated if any of the PQ field(s) has an odd charge under $\mathbb{Z}_4^R$. We present two explicit models which we refer to as a minimal model where R-parity violation is extremely suppressed, and a non-minimal model where R-parity violation is significant. In the latter model, the neutralino becomes unstable even if it is the Lightest Supersymmetric Particle (LSP), and, in addition, there are new low-energy vector-like states. In both examples, R-parity violation is sufficiently suppressed such that the proton is stable.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.