Paper detail

Quadratic Gröbner bases of twinned order polytopes

Let $P$ and $Q$ be finite partially ordered sets on $[d] = \{1, \ldots, d\}$, and $\mathcal{O}(P) \subset \mathbb{R}^{d}$ and $\mathcal{O}(Q) \subset \mathbb{R}^{d}$ their order polytopes. The twinned order polytope of $P$ and $Q$ is the convex polytope $Δ(P,-Q) \subset \mathbb{R}^{d}$ which is the convex hull of $\mathcal{O}(P) \cup (- \mathcal{O}(Q))$. It follows that the origin of $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ belongs to the interior of $Δ(P,-Q)$ if and only if $P$ and $Q$ possess a common linear extension. It will be proved that, when the origin of $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ belongs to the interior of $Δ(P,-Q)$, the toric ideal of $Δ(P,-Q)$ possesses a quadratic Gröbner basis with respect to a reverse lexicographic order for which the variable corresponding to the origin is smallest. Thus in particular if $P$ and $Q$ possess a common linear extension, then the twinned order polytope $Δ(P,-Q)$ is a normal Gorenstein Fano polytope.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.