Paper detail

Quadratic-Curve-Lifted Reed-Solomon Codes

Lifted codes are a class of evaluation codes attracting more attention due to good locality and intermediate availability. In this work we introduce and study quadratic-curve-lifted Reed-Solomon (QC-LRS) codes, where the codeword symbols whose coordinates are on a quadratic curve form a codeword of a Reed-Solomon code. We first develop a necessary and sufficient condition on the monomials which form a basis the code. Based on the condition, we give upper and lower bounds on the dimension and show that the asymptotic rate of a QC-LRS code over $\mathbb{F}_q$ with local redundancy $r$ is $1-Θ(q/r)^{-0.2284}$. Moreover, we provide analytical results on the minimum distance of this class of codes and compare QC-LRS codes with lifted Reed-Solomon codes by simulations in terms of the local recovery capability against erasures. For short lengths, QC-LRS codes have better performance in local recovery for erasures than LRS codes of the same dimension.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.