Paper detail

Quadrant marked mesh patterns in 132-avoiding permutations I

This paper is a continuation of the systematic study of the distributions of quadrant marked mesh patterns initiated in [6]. Given a permutation $\sg = \sg_1 ... \sg_n$ in the symmetric group $S_n$, we say that $\sg_i$ matches the quadrant marked mesh pattern $MMP(a,b,c,d)$ if there are at least $a$ elements to the right of $\sg_i$ in $\sg$ that are greater than $\sg_i$, at least $b$ elements to left of $\sg_i$ in $\sg$ that are greater than $\sg_i$, at least $c$ elements to left of $\sg_i$ in $\sg$ that are less than $\sg_i$, and at least $d$ elements to the right of $\sg_i$ in $\sg$ that are less than $\sg_i$. We study the distribution of $MMP(a,b,c,d)$ in 132-avoiding permutations. In particular, we study the distribution of $MMP(a,b,c,d)$, where only one of the parameters $a,b,c,d$ are non-zero. In a subsequent paper [7], we will study the the distribution of $MMP(a,b,c,d)$ in 132-avoiding permutations where at least two of the parameters $a,b,c,d$ are non-zero.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.