Paper detail

QoS Survey in IPv6 and Queuing Methods

The routes in IP networks are determined by the IP destination address and the routing tables in each router on the path to the destination. Hence all the IP packets follow the same route until the route is changes due to congestion, link failure or topology updates. IPv4 tried using Type of Service (TOS) field in the IP header to classify traffic and that did not succeed as it was based on fair self-classification of applications in comparison to the network traffic of other applications. As multimedia applications were quite foreign at the initial IPv4 stage, TOS field was not used uniformly. As there are different existing Quality of Service (QoS) paradigms available, IPv6 QoS approach was designed to be more flexible. The IPv6 protocol thus has QoS-specific elements in Base header and Extension headers which can be used in different ways to enhance multimedia application performance. In this paper, we plan to survey these options and other QoS architectures and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. Some basic simulation for various queuing schemes is presented for comparison and a new queuing scheme prioritized WFQ with RR is proposed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.