Paper detail

QMC integration based on arbitrary (t,m,s)-nets yields optimal convergence rates on several scales of function spaces

We study the integration problem over the $s$-dimensional unit cube on four types of Banach spaces of integrands. First we consider Haar wavelet spaces, consisting of functions whose Haar wavelet coefficients exhibit a certain decay behavior measured by a parameter $α>0$. We study the worst case error of integration over the norm unit ball and provide upper error bounds for quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) cubature rules based on arbitrary $(t,m,s)$-nets as well as matching lower error bounds for arbitrary cubature rules. These results show that using arbitrary $(t,m,s)$-nets as sample points yields the best possible rate of convergence. Afterwards we study spaces of integrands of fractional smoothness $α\in (0,1)$ and state a sharp Koksma-Hlawka-type inequality. More precisely, we show that on those spaces the worst case error of integration is equal to the corresponding fractional discrepancy. Those spaces can be continuously embedded into tensor product Bessel potential spaces, also known as Sobolev spaces of dominated mixed smoothness, with the same set of parameters. The latter spaces can be embedded into suitable Besov spaces of dominating mixed smoothness $α$, which in turn can be embedded into the Haar wavelet spaces with the same set of parameters. Therefore our upper error bounds on Haar wavelet spaces for QMC cubatures based on $(t,m,s)$-nets transfer (with possibly different constants) to the corresponding spaces of integrands of fractional smoothness and to Sobolev and Besov spaces of dominating mixed smoothness. Moreover, known lower error bounds for periodic Sobolev and Besov spaces of dominating mixed smoothness show that QMC integration based on arbitrary $(t,m,s)$-nets yields the best possible convergence rate on periodic as well as on non-periodic Sobolev and Besov spaces of dominating smoothness.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.