Paper detail

QGP droplet formation in small asymmetric collision systems

The journal Nature recently published a letter titled "Creating small circular, elliptical, and triangular droplets of quark-gluon plasma" [1]. The basis for that claim is a combination of measured Fourier amplitudes $v_2$ and $v_3$ from collision systems $p$-Au, $d$-Au and $h$-Au (helion $h$ is the nucleus of atom $^3$He), Glauber Monte Carlo estimates of initial-state transverse collision geometries for those systems and hydro Monte Carlo descriptions of the $v_n$ data. Correspondence between hydro $v_n$ trends and data trends is interpreted as confirmation of "collectivity" occurring in the small collision systems, further interpreted to indicate QGP formation. QGP formation in small systems runs counter to pre-RHIC theoretical assumptions that QGP formation should require large collision systems (e.g. central A-A collisions). There is currently available a broad context of experimental data from $p$-$p$, A-A and $p$-Pb collisions at the RHIC and LHC against which the validity of the Nature letter claims may be evaluated. This talk provides a summary of such results and their implications. [1] Nature Phys. 15, no. 3, 214 (2019).}

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.