Paper detail

QCL dynamics: thermal effects and rate equations beyond mean-field approach

The correct accounting for thermal effects is always a challenge when one needs to make quantitative predictions for any laser applications. In such complicated devices as quantum cascade lasers temperature strongly affects the operational conditions preventing reaching the CW mode as well as efficient lasing in pulsed regime. Rate equations are the most effective and simple way to model laser dynamics. However, the conventional approaches operate under the mean-field approximation, considering finite number of population levels, generalizing the obtained results to the infinite number of cascades, and do not take heating into account. In this work we modify the conventional three-level rate equation approach by adding self-heating description and applying it to the calculation of QCL dynamics. As a result we show how temperature affects the threshold characteristics and build-up time and include electronic aspects to the description of QCL.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.