Paper detail

QCD tests from $e^+e^- \rar I=1~$ hadrons data and implication on the value of $α_s$ from $τ$-decays

We re-examine the estimate of $\als$ and of the QCD condensates from $e^+e^-\rar I=1$ hadrons data. We conclude that $e^+e^-$ at low energies gives a value of $Λ$ compatible with the one from LEP and from tau inclusive decay. Using a $τ$-like inclusive process and QCD spectral sum rules, we estimate the size of the $D$=4 to 9 condensates by a fitting procedure {\it without invoking stability criteria}. We find $\la \als G^2 \ra =(7.1\pm 0.7)10^{-2}$ GeV$^4$, $ρ\als\la \bar uu\ra^2= (5.8\pm 0.9)10^{-4}$ GeV$^6$, which confirm previous sum rules estimate based on stability criteria. The corrections due to the $D=8$ condensates and to instantons on the vector component of $τ$-decay are respectively $δ^{(8)}_1= -(1.5\pm 0.6)10^{-2}(1.78/M_τ)^8$ and $δ^{(9)}_1=-(7.0\pm 26.5)10^{-4}(1.78/M_τ)^9 $, which indicate that the $δ^{(8)}_1$ is one order magnitude higher than the vacuum saturation value, while the $D\geq 9$ instanton-like contribution to the the vector component of the $τ$-decay width is a negligible correction. We also show that, due to the correlation between the $D=4$ and $1/M^2_τ$ contributions in the ratio of the Laplace sum rules, the present value of the gluon condensate already excludes the recent estimate of the $1/M^2_τ$-term from FESR in the axial-vector channel. Combining our non-perturbative results with the resummed perturbative corrections to the $τ$-width $R_τ$, we deduce from the present data $α_s(M_τ)= 0.33\pm 0.03$.

preprint1995arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.