Paper detail

QCD NLO predictions to $W$-pair production in association with a massive (anti)bottom-jet at the LHC

The $W$-pair production in association with a massive (anti)bottom jet is not only an important background to a number of interesting processes, such as the single top production associated with a W boson, but also a potential background to new physics searches. We present the calculations of the total and differential cross sections for the $W^+W^-+ b(\bar{b})$ jet productions at the LHC up to the QCD next-to-leading order (NLO). Our results by adopting the QCD NLO contribution collection scheme-I show that the K factors can be 1.66 and 1.21 with the inclusive and exclusive two-jet event selection schemes respectively, when we set $m_H=120 GeV$, $μ=m_W+m_b/2$ and take the constraints of $p_{T,b(\bar{b})}>25 GeV$, $|y_{b(\bar{b})}|<2.5$ for $b(\bar{b})$ jet. We find that the stabilization of the theoretical prediction for the integrated cross section for the $pp \to W^+W^-b(\bar b)+X$ up to the QCD NLO requires a veto on a second isolated hard jet and the inclusion of the QCD NLO contribution from the $W^+W^-b\bar{b}(bb, \bar{b}\bar{b})$ production with the final two $b(\bar{b})$ quarks being merged as one jet.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.