Paper detail

QCD Analysis of the Scale-Invariance of Jets

Studying the substructure of jets has become a powerful tool for event discrimination and for studying QCD. Typically, jet substructure studies rely on Monte Carlo simulation for vetting their usefulness; however, when possible, it is also important to compute observables with analytic methods. Here, we present a global next-to-leading-log resummation of the angular correlation function which measures the contribution to the mass of a jet from constituents that are within an angle R with respect to one another. For a scale-invariant jet, the angular correlation function should scale as a power of R. Deviations from this behavior can be traced to the breaking of scale invariance in QCD. To do the resummation, we use soft-collinear effective theory relying on the recent proof of factorization of jet observables at e+ e- colliders. Non-trivial requirements of factorization of the angular correlation function are discussed. The calculation is compared to Monte Carlo parton shower and next-to-leading order results. The different calculations are important in distinct phase space regions and exhibit that jets in QCD are, to very good approximation, scale invariant over a wide dynamical range.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.