Paper detail

q-Terms, singularities and the extended Bloch group

Our paper originated from a generalization of the Volume Conjecture to multisums of $q$-hypergeometric terms. This generalization was sketched by Kontsevich in a problem list in Aarhus University in 2006; \cite{Ko}. We introduce the notion of a $q$-hypergeometric term (in short, $q$-term). The latter is a product of ratios of $q$-factorials in linear forms in several variables. In the first part of the paper, we show how to construct elements of the Bloch group (and its extended version) given a \qterm. Their image under the Bloch-Wigner map or the Rogers dilogarithm is a finite set of periods of weight 2, in the sense of Kontsevich-Zagier. In the second part of the paper we introduce the notion of a special $q$-term, its corresponding sequence of polynomials, and its generating series. Examples of special $q$-terms come naturally from Quantum Topology, and in particular from planar projections of knots. The two parts are tied together by a conjecture that relates the singularities of the generating series of a special $q$-term with the periods of the corresponding elements of the extended Bloch group. In some cases (such as the $4_1$ knot), the conjecture is known.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.