Paper detail

q-Fuzzy spheres and quantum differentials on B_q[SU_2] and U_q(su_2)

Whereas the classical sphere $C P^1$ can be defined as the coordinate algebra generated by the matrix entries of a projector $e$ with $\trace(e)=1$, the fuzzy-sphere is defined in the same way by $\trace(e)=1+λ$. We show that the standard $q$-sphere is similarly defined by $\trace_q(e)=1$ and the Podles 2-spheres by $\trace_q(e)=1+λ$, thereby giving a unified point of view in which the 2-parameter Podles spheres are $q$-fuzzy spheres. We show further that they arise geometrically as `constant time slices' of the unit hyperboloid in $q$-Minkowski space viewed as the braided group $B_q[SU_2]$. Their localisations are then isomorphic to quotients of $U_q(su_2)$ at fixed values of the $q$-Casimir precisely $q$-deforming the fuzzy case. We use transmutation and twisting theory to introduce a $C_q[G_C]$-covariant calculus on general $B_q[G]$ and $U_q(g)$, and use $Ω(B_q[SU_2])$ to provide a unified point of view on the 3D calculi on fuzzy and Podles spheres. To complete the picture we show how the covariant calculus on the 3D bicrossproduct spacetime arises from $Ω(C_q[SU_2])$ prior to twisting.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.