Paper detail

q-Analogs of Steiner Systems

A Steiner structure $\dS = \dS_q[t,k,n]$ is a set of $k$-dimensional subspaces of $\F_q^n$ such that each $t$-dimensional subspace of $\F_q^n$ is contained in exactly one subspace of $\dS$. Steiner structures are the $q$-analogs of Steiner systems; they are presently known to exist only for $t = 1$, $t=k$, and\linebreak for $k = n$. The existence of nontrivial $q$-analogs of Steiner systems has occupied mathematicians for over three decades. In fact, it was conjectured that they do not exist. In this paper, we show that nontrivial Steiner structures do exist. First, we describe a general method which may be used to produce Steiner structures. The method uses two mappings in a finite field: the Frobenius map and the cyclic shift map. These maps are applied to codes in the Grassmannian, in order to form an automorphism group of the Steiner structure. Using this method, assisted by an exact-cover computer search, we explicitly generate a Steiner structure $\dS_2[2,3,13]$. We conjecture that many other Steiner structures, with different parameters, exist.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.