Paper detail

PZ Mon is a new synchronous binary with low mass ratio

Analysis of new radial velocity measurements of the active giant PZ Mon is presented. Only in 2015 was reported that PZ Mon may be classified as RS CVn giant. At the same time was discovered the variability of radial velocity. However, lack of the data is not allowed to determine parameters of the system. The measurements of radial velocity were performed using Radial Velocity Meter installed at the Simeiz 1-m telescope of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory and using echelle spectrographs installed at the 2-m Zeiss telescope of the Terskol Observatory and the 6-m telescope BTA of the Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences. We estimated parameters of this binary system including the $γ$-velocity 25.5$\pm$0.3 kms, the period on the circular orbit $P=34.15\pm0.02$ days, the mass of the secondary component $M_2$=0.14 \Mo, and the mass ratio $q=0.09$ The mass ratio is a smallest value among known RS CVn type giants. Combined with photometric data we conclude that PZ Mon is a system with synchronous rotation, and there is a big cool spotted area on the stellar surface towards to the secondary component that provides the optical variability.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.