Paper detail

Pure semisimplicity conjecture and Artin problem for dimension sequences

Inspired by a recent paper due to José Luis García, we revisit the attempt of Daniel Simson to construct a counterexample to the pure semisimplicity conjecture. Using compactness, we show that the existence of such counterexample would readily follow from the very existence of certain (countable set of) hereditary artinian rings of finite representation type. The existence of such rings is then proved to be equivalent to the existence of special types of embeddings, which we call tight, of division rings into simple artinian rings. Using the tools by Aidan Schofield from 1980s, we can show that such an embedding $F\hookrightarrow M_n(G)$ exists provided that $n<5$. As a byproduct, we obtain a division ring extension $G\subseteq F$ such that the bimodule ${}_GF_F$ has the right dimension sequence $(1,2,2,2,1,4)$. Finally, we formulate Conjecture A, which asserts that a particular type of adjunction of an element to a division ring can be made, and demonstrate that its validity would be sufficient to prove the existence of tight embeddings in general, and hence to disprove the pure semisimplicity conjecture.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.