Paper detail

Pure QCD bounds and estimates for light quark masses

We consider bounds on light quark masses that follow from positivity of the pseudoscalar correlator spectral function plus the assumption that perturbative QCD is valid for the correlator and its derivatives up to order $N$ for momenta $t\geq\hat{t}$. We find that the bounds vary a lot depending on the assumed value of $\hat{t}$ and even, if it is too small ($\hat{t}\simeq 1.5, 1.6, 2.1 Gev^2$ for respectively $N=0, 1, 2$), that there is incompatibility between the asumption of validity of perturbative QCD and positivity. This allows us to establish a criterion for the values of $\hat{t}$ admissible, and to get upper and lower bounds for $m_s$ and upper bounds for $m_d+m_u, m_d-m_u$. The upper bounds are not particularly interesting, but the lower ones are very tight; specifically we find $$240 Mev\leq m_s; 16 Mev\leq m_d+m_u$$ if we assume perturbative QCD to give a valid description of the correlator for $t\geq 2.2 Gev^2$; or, if it only holds for $t\geq 4.5 Gev^2$ then $$150 Mev\leq m_s; 10 Mev\leq m_d+m_u.$$ Here the masses are running masses defined at $1 Gev$. We also show reasonable models where the bounds are saturated. The results suggest that some of the current estimates of the light quark masses are less precise than ordinarily claimed.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.