Pure pairs. VII. Homogeneous submatrices in 0/1-matrices with a forbidden submatrix

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Abstract

For integer n>0n>0, let f(n)f(n) be the number of rows of the largest all-0 or all-1 square submatrix of MM, minimized over all n×nn\times n 0/10/1-matrices MM. Thus f(n)=O(log⁡n)f(n)= O(\log n). But let us fix a matrix HH, and define fH(n)f_H(n) to be the same, minimized over over all n×nn\times n 0/10/1-matrices MM such that neither MM nor its complement (that is, change all 00's to 11's and vice versa) contains HH as a submatrix. It is known that fH(n)≥εncf_H(n)\ge εn^c, where c,ε>0c, ε>0 are constants depending on HH. When can we take c=1c=1? If so, then one of HH and its complement must be an acyclic matrix (that is, the corresponding bipartite graph is a forest). Korandi, Pach, and Tomon conjectured the converse, that fH(n)f_H(n) is linear in nn for every acyclic matrix HH; and they proved it for certain matrices HH with only two rows. Their conjecture remains open, but we show fH(n)=n1−o(1)f_H(n)=n^{1-o(1)} for every acyclic matrix HH; and indeed there is a 0/10/1-submatrix that is either Ω(n)×n1−o(1)Ω(n)\times n^{1-o(1)} or n1−o(1)×Ω(n)n^{1-o(1)}\times Ω(n).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.