Paper detail

Pure-mode correlation functions for cosmic shear and application to KiDS-1000

One probe for systematic effects in gravitational lensing surveys is the presence of so-called B-modes in the cosmic shear two-point correlation functions ξ_\pm(\vt), since lensing is expected to produce only E-mode shear. Furthermore, there exist ambiguous modes which can not uniquely be assigned to either E- or B-mode shear. We derive explicit equations for the pure-mode shear correlation functions ξ_\pm^E/B(\vt) and their ambiguous components ξ_\pm^amb(\vt), that can be derived from the measured ξ_\pm(\vt) on a finite angular interval \tmin\le\vt\le\tmax, such that the latter can be decomposed uniquely into pure-mode functions as ξ_+=ξ_+^E+ξ_+^B+ξ_+^amb and ξ_-=ξ_-^E-ξ_-^B+ξ_-^amb. The derivation is obtained by defining a new set of COSEBIs, for which explicit relations are obtained, and which yields a smaller covariance between COSEBI modes. We derive the relation between ξ_\pm^E/B/amb and the underlying E-/B-mode power spectra. The pure-mode correlation functions can provide a diagnostics of systematics in configuration space. We then apply our results to SLICS simulations and the KiDS-1000 cosmic shear data, calculate the new COSEBIs and the pure-mode correlation functions, as well as the corresponding covariances, and show that the new statistics fit equally well to the best-fitting cosmological model as the previous KiDS-1000 analysis and recovers the same level of (insignificant) B-modes. We also consider in some detail the ambiguous modes at first- and second-order level, finding some surprising results; for example, the shear field of a point mass, when cut along a line through the center, can not be ascribed uniquely to an E-mode shear and is thus ambiguous, and the shear correlation functions resulting from a random ensemble of point masses, when measured over a finite angular range, correspond to an ambiguous mode.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.