Paper detail

Pure dephasing in flux qubits due to flux noise with spectral density scaling as $1/ f^α$

For many types of superconducting qubits, magnetic flux noise is a source of pure dephasing. Measurements on a representative dc superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) over a range of temperatures show that $S_Φ(f) = A^2/(f/1 \hbox{Hz})^α$, where $S_Φ$ is the flux noise spectral density, $A$ is of the order of 1 $μΦ_0 \, \hbox{Hz}^{-1/2}$ and $0.61 \leq α\leq 0.95$; $Φ_{0}$ is the flux quantum. For a qubit with an energy level splitting linearly coupled to the applied flux, calculations of the dependence of the pure dephasing time $τ_ϕ$ of Ramsey and echo pulse sequences on $α$ for fixed $A$ show that $τ_ϕ$ decreases rapidly as $α$ is reduced. We find that $τ_ϕ$ is relatively insensitive to the noise bandwidth, $f_1 \leq f \leq f_2$, for all $α$ provided the ultraviolet cutoff frequency $f_2 > 1/τ_ϕ$. We calculate the ratio $τ_{ϕ,E} / τ_{ϕ,R}$ of the echo ($E$) and Ramsey ($R$) sequences, and the dependence of the decay function on $α$ and $f_2$. We investigate the case in which $S_Φ(f_0)$ is fixed at the "pivot frequency" $f_0 \neq 1$ Hz while $α$ is varied, and find that the choice of $f_0$ can greatly influence the sensitivity of $τ_{ϕ,E}$ and $τ_{ϕ,R}$ to the value of $α$. Finally, we present calculated values of $τ_ϕ$ in a qubit corresponding to the values of $A$ and $α$ measured in our SQUID.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.