Paper detail

Punctuated evolution of influenza virus hemagglutinin (A/H1N1) under opposing migration and vaccination pressures

Influenza virus contains two highly variable envelope glycoproteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). The structure and properties of HA, which is responsible for binding the virus to the cell that is being infected, change significantly when the virus is transmitted from avian or swine species to humans. Previously we identified much smaller human individual evolutionary amino acid mutational changes in NA, which cleaves sialic acid groups and is required for influenza virus replication. We showed that these smaller changes can be monitored very accurately across many Uniprot and NCBI strains using hydropathicity scales to quantify the roughness of water film packages, which increases gradually due to migration, but decreases abruptly under large-scale vaccination pressures. Here we show that, while HA evolution is much more complex, it still shows abrupt punctuation changes linked to those of NA. HA exhibits proteinquakes, which resemble earthquakes and are related to hydropathic shifting of sialic acid binding regions. HA proteinquakes based on sialic acid interactions are required for optimal balance between the receptor-binding and receptor-destroying activities of HA and NA for efficient virus replication. Our comprehensive results present an historical (1945-2011) panorama of HA evolution over thousands of strains, and are consistent with many studies of HA and NA interactions based on a few mutations of a few strains. While the common influenza virus discussed here has been rendered almost harmless by decades of vaccination programs, the sequential decoding lessons learned here are applicable to other viruses that are emerging as powerful weapons for controlling and even curing common organ cancers. Those engineered oncolytic drugs will be discussed in future papers.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.