Paper detail

Pulsational instability of supergiant protostars: Do they grow supermassive by accretion?

Supermassive stars (SMSs; M>10^5 Msun) and their remnant black holes are promising progenitors for supermassive black holes (SMBHs) observed in the early universe at z>7. It has been postulated that SMSs forms through very rapid mass accretion onto a protostar at a high rate exceeding 0.01 Msun/yr. According to recent studies, such rapidly accreting protostars evolve into "supergiant protostars", i.e. protostars consisting of a bloated envelope and a contracting core, similar to giant star. However, like massive stars as well as giant stars, both of which are known to be pulsationally unstable, supergiant protostars may also be also unstable to launch strong pulsation-driven outflows. If this is the case, the stellar growth via accretion will be hindered by the mass loss. We here study the pulsational stability of the supergiant protostars in the mass range M<10^3 Msun through the method of the linear perturbation analysis. We find that the supergiant protostars with M>600 Msun and very high accretion rate Mdot>1.0 Msun/yr are unstable due to the kappa mechanism. The pulsation is excited in the He^+ ionization layer in the envelope. Even under a conservative assumption that all the pulsation energy is converted into the kinetic energy of the outflows, the mass-loss rate is ~10^-3 Msun/yr, which is lower than the accretion rate by more than two orders of magnitude. We thus conclude that the supergiant protostars should grow stably via rapid accretion at least in the mass range we studied. As long as the rapid accretion is maintained in the later stage, protostars will become SMSs, which eventually produce seeds for the high-z SMBHs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.