Paper detail

Pulsational instability of pre-main-sequence models from accreting protostars II. Modelling echelle diagrams of $δ$ Scuti stars without rotational splitting

The physics of early stellar evolution (e.g. accretion processes) is often not properly included in the calculations of pre-main-sequence models, leading to insufficient model grids and hence systematic errors in the results. We aim to investigate current and improved approaches for the asteroseismic modelling of pre-main-sequence delta Scuti stars. We calculated an extensive grid of pre-main-sequence models including the early accretion phase and used the resulting equilibrium models as input to calculate theoretical frequency spectra. These spectra were used to investigate different approaches in modelling echelle diagrams to find the most reliable methods. By applying Petersen diagrams, we present a simple algorithm to extract echelle diagrams from observed pulsation frequencies. We show that model grids with insufficient input physics and imperfect modelling approaches lead to underestimated uncertainties and systematic errors in the extracted stellar parameters. Our re-discussion of HD 139614 leads to different stellar parameters than the ones derived by Murphy et al. (2021). We performed a model comparison between this previous investigation and our results by applying the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. While the results with regard to our 10-d model are inconclusive, they show (very) strong evidence of a 6-d model with fixed accretion parameters (leading to almost identical stellar parameters to those of the 10-d model) to be preferred over the model applied by Murphy et al. (2021). In general, our modelling approach can provide narrow constraints on the stellar parameters (ΔR ~ 0.05 R_\odot, Δlog g <~ 0.01, and ΔM_\star ~ 0.1 M_\odot). The extensively tested modelling approaches and automatic extraction of echelle diagrams should allow us to study many more pre-main-sequence delta Scuti stars in the future and lead to reliable stellar parameters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.